“No one knows what I’m going to do”: Trump embraces ambiguity towards Iran | Donald Trump News

President Donald Trump continued to Offer mixed signals on the question of whether the United States intervene directly In the current conflict between Israel and Iran, which experienced six days of intense bombing.

The republican chief started his Wednesday on the lawn of the White House, where he installed two giant masts, each 88 feet – or 27 meters – high.

During this appearance, however, it was confronted with the question that is looming with the Middle East conflict: would the United States join Israel to strike Iranian nuclear installations?

“You don’t know I’m even going to do it,” Trump told a journalist. “I can do it. I may not do it. No one knows what I’m going to do. I can tell you this: Iran has a lot of problems, and they want to negotiate. ”

Later, when he posed for photographs in the oval office with the Juventus football club, Trump again pointed out that he had not decided to do so before the last possible moment.

“I have ideas on what to do, but I did not make a final (call),” said Trump.

“I like to make a final decision for a second before it is due, you know?” Because things change, especially with war. Things change with war. It can move from one extreme to another. ”

This ambiguity as to whether the United States can enter the fray has fueled uncertainty in the conflict – and has led to the controversy on Trump’s domestic front.

Military to “stay ready”

Some Republicans and Democrats have introduced legislation to limit Trump’s ability to engage in fights between Iran and Israel. Meanwhile, the conservative commentator Tucker Carlson published a video interview He recorded with the right-wing senator Ted Cruz, where the two Trump supporters clashed if the United States should put pressure on a regime change in Iran.

Trump himself was invited to weigh on their debate on the oval office on Wednesday. The president reported that he was sympathetic to Carlson’s desire to keep the United States away from an expensive foreign conflict – but with a warning.

“I don’t want to fight either. I’m not trying to fight,” said Trump. “But if this is a situation between fights and nuclear weapons, you have to do what you have to do. Maybe we will not have to fight. Do not forget: we have not fought.”

The Trump administration described the initial strike of Israel on June 13 as a “unilateral action”. But the president himself reported that he knew the attack in advance and supported the military campaign of Israel.

As a testimony to the Congress, the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, told legislators that the US military would be ready if it was called.

“President Trump’s word means something. The world understands it,” said Hegseth. “And at the Ministry of Defense, our work is to stay ready and prepared with options. And this is precisely what we do. ”

Speculation on nuclear capacities

The current conflict, Trump has repeatedly argued, would never have started if Iran had accepted American conditions to limit its nuclear program. US officials had met their Iranian counterparts Since April To talk about the limitation of the enrichment of uranium by Iran, a step necessary to build a nuclear weapon.

But Iran has long denied any ambition to build a nuclear arsenal and rather argued that its uranium is used for civil energy purposes.

However, Trump linked the in progress conflict with Israel fear that Iran has approached To build a bomb. He warned that if Iran had a nuclear weapon, “the whole world will explode”.

“I have said for 20 years, perhaps longer, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I have been saying it for a long time, and I think they were a few weeks old to have one,” said Trump on Wednesday.

In March, however, Trump’s national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard said in the congress that the American intelligence community had evaluated “Iran does not build a nuclear weapon”. She has since fallen this comment, calling for her online position with that of the president.

Critics have warned that Trump could build the case of participation in the United States in the conflict between Israel and Iran by highlighting the risk of Iranian uranium enrichment facilities.

Israel also indicated the possibility of an Iranian nuclear weapon as a reason to launch the first strike. An American ally, Israel, would have greatly would have its own non -disclosed nuclear arsenal.

Negotiations at neutral

Negotiations with the United States, however, came to a stop after the Israel strike on June 13, which moved away from an animated missile exchange. A meeting scheduled for the weekend has been canceled, and some of Iran’s representatives in nuclear talks were killed in the initial explosions, as are military chiefs and scientists.

Trump deplored the failure of these talks on Wednesday, blaming Iran for having failed to comply with a deadline of 60 days which he set in April.

“Why did you not negotiate with me before all this death and this destruction?” Trump asked. “I told people: why didn’t you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done well. You could have had a country. It’s very sad to look at this.”

He confirmed that Iranian officials had contacted him a meeting of the White House since the recent conflict.

“I said it was very late to speak,” Trump told journalists, relaying his answer. “There is a big difference now and a week ago.”

Trump’s own words in recent days have fueled the fears that the conflict can degenerate into a regional war. Just a watch on Tuesday, Trump Publicly surveyed That he could kill the supreme chief of Iran, Ali Khamenei, and called for the country’s “unconditional surrender”.

Iran has since responded to Trump’s comments. In an interview with CNN host Christiane Amanpour, the Iranian Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Majid Takht-Ravanchi rejected information that his officials were trying to make negotiations with the United States on the right track.

“We are not holding out to anyone. We defend ourselves,” said Takht-Ravanchi. “We can negotiate under threats. We cannot negotiate while our people are under bombing every day. So we didn’t go. ”

“If the Americans get involved directly, our hands will certainly not be linked. We will do everything necessary to protect our people and our interests. ”

Khamenei himself said that participation in the United States in the conflict would have “serious irreparable consequences” and would have denounced Trump’s threats.

Repeated calls for “unconditional surrender”

Trump himself Wednesday offered different interpretations of how he saw the conflict ending, the first to come in his appearance on the lawn of the White House, where he repeated his call to “unconditional surrender”.

“Unconditional addition: it means that I got it. Ok? I got it. I give up. No more. Then, we’re going to blow up all the nuclear things that are everywhere,” said Trump, blaming Iran again for fighting.

“They had bad intentions. For 40 years, they have said: Death to America! Death in Israel! Death to anyone who did not like. They were intimate. They were school court intimidators, and now they are no longer intimidators. ”

Later, in the oval office, Trump said that the conflict could be resolved simply by ensuring that Iran did not get their hands on a nuclear weapon.

“We are not looking for a cease-fire. We are looking for a total total victory. Do you know what is the victory? No nuclear weapon. “

He warned that the coming week would be “very big” – although he did not share any detail on what it meant for the future of the conflict.

The number of deaths in Iran would have reached 240 people, including 70 women and children.