India says that it will never restore ”the industrial water Treaty with Pakistan | India-Pakistan Tensions News

New Delhi put in his examination ” His participation in the cross -border treaty of 1960 after 26 people were killed in cashmere administered by the Indians in April.

India will never restore the Industry Water Treaty With neighboring Pakistan, and the flowing water will be diverted for internal use, explains the Federal Minister of the Interior Amit Shah.

India has taken into account its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the use of the Industry river system, after 26 people were killed in cashmere administered by the Indians in April, in what New Delhi described as an act of terror supported by Pakistan.

Pakistan denied its participation in the incident, which led to days of combat between the two nuclear powers – their worst military climbing for decades, bringing them to the edge of another war.

Despite a cease-fire agreed by the two nations last month, Shah said that his government would not restore the treaty, which Guaranteed water access For 80% of Pakistani farms across three rivers from India.

“It will never be restored,” Shah told the Times of India newspaper in an interview on Saturday.

“We will take water flowing in Pakistan to Rajasthan by building a channel. Pakistan will be hungry for water which he has been unjustified,” he added, referring to the state of the Indian desert in the Northwest.

The agreement on cross -border waters allows the two countries to share the water flowing from the Indus basin, giving the control of India three oriental Himalayas rivers – Ravi, Sutlej and Beas – while Pakistan has taken control of the three Western rivers – Jhelum, Chenab and Industry.

The Treaty also established the Indus Commission in India-Pakistan, which is supposed to solve any problem that arises. Until now, it has survived anterior armed conflicts and almost constant tensions between India and Pakistan over the past 65 years.

However, Shah’s comments, the most powerful minister in Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have attenuated Islamabad’s hopes for short -term treatments.

Pakistan has not yet responded to Shah’s comments. But he said in the past that the treaty had no provision for one side to withdraw unilaterally, and that any blockage of river water The passage of Pakistan will be considered “an act of war”.

“The treaty cannot be changed, and it cannot be dismissed by any party unless the two agree,” said Pakistani Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ishaq Dar last month.

Islamabad also explores a legal challenge to India’s decision to maintain the treaty under international law.

Legal experts told Al Jazeera in April that the treaty could not be suspended unilaterally and that it can only be modified by a mutual agreement between the parties.

“India has used the word” suspension “, and there is not such a provision to” hold it in suspense “in the treaty,” said Ahmer Bilal SOOFI, a Pakistani lawyer, in Al Jazeera. “He also violates the customary international laws relating to the upper and lower resident, where the upper resident cannot stop the promise of water for the lower resident.”

Anuttama Banerji, political analyst based in New Delhi, told Al Jazeera in April that the treaty could continue, but not in its current form.

“Instead, it will be for the” revision “, the” review “and the” modification ” – the three signifying different things – taking into account new challenges such as the exhaustion of groundwater and climate change were not taken care of in the original treaty,” said Banerji.