The verification of Trump’s facts according to which the crime in Washington is “out of control” | Donald Trump News

US President Donald Trump said he was deploying 800 National Guard soldiers in Washington, DC, and took control of his police service after stating that crime was “out of control” in the capital.

The national capital “becomes a situation of complete and total anarchy,” said Trump in a August 11 press conference While invoking the law on the domicile rule to take federal control of the city.

“Washington, DC, should be one of the safest, cleanest and most beautiful cities in the world, and we will do this.”

But many of the details mentioned by Trump cannot resist the exam.

Trump’s actions are a step towards taking his threat of federal district control after carjackers seriously beaten a former employee of the Government Ministry.

In a press briefing after Trump’s announcement, Washington, DC, mayor Muriel Bowser said the district would cooperate with the federal government and added that it often speaks with Trump of the City Progress on Crime.

“In fact, my first meeting with him after being elected the second time, we reviewed the trends in crime; we have traveled the way we see decreasing, so the president is read in our efforts,” she said.

So why did Trump decided to take DC under federal control, and did he claim that the crime rate had increased in the capital?

Can Trump invoke a federal takeover of Washington, DC, under article 740 of DC Home Rule Act?

Trump can’t to resume the city without approval of the congress. He uses an emergency provision to temporarily supervise the district police forces.

The American Constitution has created the Columbia district as the siege of the federal government. In 1973, President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Actallowing residents of the district to elect a mayor and a municipal council. The law gives the autonomy of the district for local governance, but the city always responds to the congress on issues, including budgetary surveillance and the capacity to overthrow local legislation.

Article 740 of the law on the domicile rule allows the president to temporarily take control of the city’s police service in an emergency.

In an executive decree of August 11, Trump invoked article 740, citing crime in the district as emergency. The decree indicates that the federal use of the district metropolitan police service is necessary to maintain law and order; Protect buildings and federal monuments; And ensure “the conditions necessary for the ordered functioning of the federal government”.

Trump delegated operational control of the department US prosecutor Pam Bondi.

Emergency powers cannot extend the 48 hours during the 48 hours, depending on the law, unless the president indicates the congress in written reason and the necessary period. If he informs the Congress, Trump can extend the emergency up to 30 days.

Washington, DCAre homicides reaching the highest rate ever made in 2023?

Trump said: “The murders in 2023 have reached the highest rate, probably never. They say 25 years old, but they don’t know what it means, because it goes up to 25 years. Can’t be worse.”

Data from the city’s metropolitan police department showed 274 homicides in 2023, the greatest number in the past 20 years. Trump omitted that data on preliminary crime of the ministry show that homicides decreased by 32% since 2023, to 187 in 2024.

THE The homicide rate continues to decrease. This year, until August 11, homicides decreased by 12% compared to the same period in 2024.

Jeff Asher, analyst for Ah datalytics, told Politifact that the The homicide rate has increased Bustially after 2020, culminating in 2023 at 39 per 100,000 people.

It was the highest rate since 2003, but below the 1991 peak of 81 per 100,000 people. The drop in prices corresponds to national trends, said Asher.

The White House spokesman Steven Cheung said that city police statistics are not as they seem. Cheung attached a History of TRV in July on the suspension of a district police commander after being accused of having changed crime statistics.

The president of the fraternal police police, Gregg Pemberton, told the television channel that the members of the union and the management declared that the command staff wanted to “ensure that these classifications of these reports were adjusted over time to ensure that the global crime statistics remain down”.

A police spokesman told Politifact that Commander Michael Pouliam was on administrative leave and that the ministry could not comment on the internal investigations. The union did not respond to our request for comments.

Violent crimes such as car diversion increased to Washington, DC?

Trump said: “The number of car flights has doubled in the past five years, and the number of cars has more than tripled.”

Trump is right to say that the number of these crimes has increased, but he did not mention a recent drop in carjacks.

The city’s dashboard shows that the diversions of cars increased from 2020 to 2023 before decreasing in 2024. This year, until August 9, there were 188 auto-detens against 299 during the same period in 2024, and compared to 607 in 2023, said a police spokesperson.

Preliminary data flight data from the city showed a decrease of 25% from 2023 to 2024, and car flights are essentially annual to date in 2025 compared to the same period last year.

“Auto flight increased a huge amount to DC after 2020 before relaxing in 2023 after the publication of the video showing how to steal certain models of Kia and Hyundai cars,” said Asher. The “Kia Boyz” phenomenon occurred nationally.

Overall, city data show that, until August 11 of this year, compared to 2024, violent crimes in the district decreased by 26%. Washington, the drop in violent DC crimes is part of a national trend in major cities.

Does the implementation of the deposit without species affect crime rates?

Trump said: “The Radical Municipal Council on the left has adopted any cash deposit.

“No cash guarantee” or “deposit without species” allows certain defendants while waiting for the trial to be released from the guard without paying the deposit. Even with laws of surety without species in place, defendants accused of violent crimes, such as murder, can always be detained if the judges determine that they represent a threat of public security or a risk of theft.

The crime costs generally result in higher release rates, according to the district preliminary service agency.

In 2024, 89% of the accused were not rearracted during the period prior to the trial, the agency said.

Supporters of the elimination of cash deposit claim that a cash requirement affects low -income persons. Those who support the cash guarantee say that this guarantees that defendants appear in court and suppress it threaten public security. Washington, DC, was a pioneer of the preliminary reform, largely eliminating the cash tax in the 1990s.

There is a lack of consensus of experts on the impact of the surety without cash on crime rates.

A Brennan Center for Justice 2024 report on the left of the NYU legislation said that the researchers had revealed “no statistically significant relationship” between bond reform and crime rates. The study examined data on crime rates from 2015 to 2021 for 33 cities in the United States, including 22, including a kind of deposit reform.

The prison policy initiative, a non -profit organization that supports the reduction of the prison population, measured public security before and after preliminary reforms in four states and nine cities and counties, including Washington, DC. In general, the researchers found that the release of pre-procedures did not put communities in danger of more crime.

The Trump administration cited a report in 2022 of the District Prosecutor’s Office of Yolo County, California, as proof that endorship caused increased crime. The report explored the effects of the California temporary surety suspension during the COVVI -19 pandemic, noting that 420 people out of 595 – 70.6% – were rearraged after being released from prison under this system.

A November 2024 document from the Public Policy Institute of California also found that the implementation of emergency guarantee orders had caused a “notable increase in the probability and the number of rearrangements within 30 days”. However, once reversed, the return to cash deposit did not affect the number of rearrangements.