A left right coalition seeks to limit Trump’s power to get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict

Washington – A group of legislators covering a wide ideological spectrum stimulates alarms on the possibility that the United States played an active role in the conflict between Israel and Iran.

The emerging coalition unites strange bed companions, including some of the most fervent supporters of President Donald Trump and progressive democrats, who have been vocal opponents of the United States in foreign tangles in the years following Afghanistan and Iraqi wars, in particular without the approval of the Congress. This could also represent a serious threat to the grip that Trump holds on the right base on the right of the Republican party.

Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., A libertarian who was not afraid to overthrow tax issues, associates with the representative Ro Khanna, D-Calf., To try to force a vote on a resolution of war powers which would oblige the administration to obtain the approval of the Congress before participating in a significant conflict.

“It’s not our war,” Massie Written on x. “But if that was the case, the congress must decide such questions according to our constitution.”

Its announcement has led to a flood of progressive democrats to promise that they will support legislation, including representatives. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez From New York and Rashida Tlaib from Michigan, both members of “L’Escouade”.

“The American people do not fall for this again. We were lied about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq who killed millions of people + forever changed, “said Written on x. “It is (unconstitutional) for Trump to go to war without a vote at the Congress.”

Massie and Khanna also co-pacarraine a similar resolution during the first Trump administration seeking to limit the participation of the United States in the war in Yemen. Asset did not sign the resolutionwho adopted the Chamber and the Senate. But finally retained efforts to make the US military play an active role.

In an interview with NBC News on Tuesday, Khanna predicted that this problem could be the one where Trump’s loyalists have the resolution to break with the president.

“It’s at the heart of many in Maga’s base. It’s different,” said Khanna. “It has a different intensity from that of people who care about deficits and who are concerned about the move of Trump there, or people who do not like its tariff policy.”

This intensity is reflected in the choir of reverberating concern on the political orbit Maga. High-level commentators such as Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon warned Trump to avoid the United States in what they consider to be a conflict that could be transformed into another endless war. Trump replied by calling Carlson “Kooky”, who led representative Marjorie Taylor Green, R-GA., One of Trump’s fiercest in Capitol Hill, to rush to the defense of the former host of Fox News.

Green called Carlson “one of his favorite people” in a PublishBefore arguing that “foreign wars / the change of intervention / regime put America last, kill innocent people, make us break and finally lead to our destruction.”

Khanna said that a non -interventionist posture was the foundation of Trump’s rise.

“I have the impression that the whole Maga movement began as a rejection of the Bush and Neocon war in Iraq. It was a central part of their identity,” said Khanna.

Khanna and Massie plan to introduce the measure as a privileged resolution, which would require a full vote in a few days. President Mike Johnson, R-La., Who is closely aligned with Trump, may have the opportunity to revoke the privilege because it is a war resolution of powers. Johnson’s office did not respond to a request for comments on resolution.

If the resolution goes to the ground of the room, Khanna acknowledged that the whole Democrat conference may not be on board.

“There are still people in our Congress who voted for the war in Iraq. There are people who still have a very, more, more fellows in the Middle East,” said Khanna. “I think it’s a drop -down number.”

Through the Capitol, Senator Tim Kaine, D-VA., Fongates an effort to prohibit Trump from bringing the United States unilaterally into a war with Iran, while specifying that “the question of whether the American forces should be engaged in hostilities against Iran” can only be answered by the Congress. »»

Kaine wondered if the participation of the United States was in its interest in national security and that the minimum prerequisite is a debate and the approval of the congress.

“I am deeply concerned about the fact that recent climbing of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly attract the United States to another endless conflict,” said Kaine. “The American people have no interest in sending soldiers to fight another war forever in the Middle East.”

Regarding the obtaining of co-workers for his new resolution, a Kaine spokesman said: “Senator Kaine is in dialogue with her colleagues.”

Kaine has credibility on the issue as a frank voice for reintegration into the presidential war powers under administrations of the two parties. He led an effort in the Biden administration to return this authority to the congress after years of legislators by yielding to the executive branch, gathering bipartite support for this effort.

But previous efforts have changed the discomfort of the congress and come up against the opposition of military hawks in both parties, and the first indications are that the Republican leaders of the Senate want to support Israel.

“Although the American army is not involved in offensive operations against Iran, American forces on earth, at sea and in the air have helped to defend Israel against the attacks of blind missiles launched by Iran,” said the head of the majority of the Senate on Tuesday, Rs.d. “President Trump and our country remain firm in our defense of Israel and we are committed to working towards peace in the Middle East and, above all, for the security of American staff stationed in the region.”