Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
As a Republicans of the Senate rush to pass Their tax package and Méli -Mélo expenses – The great bill – Controversy appeared around an unusual provision: a 10 -year moratorium on states adopting their own laws regulating artificial intelligence.
The congress was slow to adopt any AI regulation, rapidly evolving technology, leaving declares to write their own laws. These laws of the state are largely focused on prevention of specific damage, such as the prohibition of the use of Deepfake technology for Create non -consensual pornography,, To mislead voters on specific issues or candidates or at Mimic Music Artists’ Voices without authorization.
Some large companies that run the American AI industry have argued that a mixture of state laws is unnecessarily isolated technology, especially since the United States seeks to compete with China. But a wide range of opposition – including certain eminent republican legislators, children’s security defenders and civil rights groups – according to states, states are a necessary bulwark against dangerous technology that can cause unknown damage in the next decade.
The Trump administration was clearly clearly that it wanted to loosen the reins of AI expansion. During his first week in power, President Donald Trump signed a decree To facilitate technology regulations and revoke “the existing AI policies and directives that act as obstacles to American IA innovation.
And in February, vice-president JD Vance delivered a speech at a top of the AI in Paris This clearly indicated that the Trump administration wanted to prioritize the domination of the AI over the regulations.
But a Study of the Pew Research Center in April have found that many more Americans who are not AI experts are more concerned with the risks of AI than on potential advantages.
“The Congress has just shown that he cannot do much in this space,” NBC NBC News told NBC, the vice-president of the Brennan Center, a non-profit organization linked to New York University that defends democratic issues.
“To say that we do nothing, and we will prevent states from doing anything is, as far as I know, unprecedented. Especially given the issues with this technology, it is really dangerous,” said Norden.
The provision of the Omnibus package was presented by the Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by the Republican Texas Ted Cruz. The Cruz office postponed the comment to the committee, which published a explanator To say that, under the proposed rule, states wishing a part of a substantial federal investment in AI must “suspend any application of any restriction of the State, as specified, linked to AI models, AI systems or automated decision -making systems for 10 years.”
On Friday, the Senate parliamentarian said that if certain provisions of the law on a large bill are subject to a threshold of 60 vote to determine whether or not they can remain in the bill, the AI moratorium is not part of it. The Republicans of the Senate said They aim to bring the bill to a vote on Saturday.
All the Democrats in the Senate should vote against the Omnibus bill. But some Republicans said they opposed the moratorium on states adopting AI laws, including
Sense. Josh Hawley of Arkansas, Jerry Moran from Kansas and Ron Johnson by Wisconsin.
Georgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, an ally of Trump, an ally, Posted on X earlier This month, when she signed the version of the bill in the bill, she did not realize that she would prevent states from creating their own laws on AI.
“Complete transparency, I did not know this section,” wrote Greene. “We have no idea what AI will be able for the next 10 years and give it free free and link the hands of states is potentially dangerous.”
The senator of Tennessee Marsha Blackburn, a republican in the Commerce Committee, said that she opposed the moratorium over 10 years.
“We cannot ban states across the country from protecting Americans, including the dynamic creative community of Tennessee, misdeeds of AI,” she said in a statement provided to NBC News. “For decades, Congress has proven incapable of adopting legislation to govern virtual space and protect vulnerable individuals against exploited by Big Tech.”
The legislators and attorneys general of the two parties also oppose the AI. An open letter signed by 260 States legislators expressed their “strong opposition” to the moratorium. “During the next decade, AI will raise some of the most important public policy issues of our time, and it is essential that state political decision -makers maintain the ability to respond,” said the letter.
Likewise, 40 prosecutors of both parties demonstrated Their opposition available in a letter to the congress. “The impact of such a broad moratorium would be the scanning and entirely destructive of the reasonable efforts of the State to prevent known damage associated with AI,” they wrote.
An analysis of the center of Brennan revealed that the moratorium would lead to a cancellation of 149 existing laws of the States.
“State regulators are trying to apply the law to protect their citizens, and they have promulgated common sense regulation that tries to protect the worst types of damage that surface their voters,” said Sarah Meyers West, the public’s co-executive, told NBC News.
“They say we have to wait 10 years before protecting people from AI abuses. These things are live. They affect people right now, “she said.
AI and technological companies like Google and Microsoft argued that the moratorium is necessary to maintain competitive industry with China.
“It is more and more recognized that the current approach of the patchwork to regulate AI does not work and will continue to worsen if we remain on this path,” said Chris Lehane, Director of World Affairs of Openai, Chris Lehane, Written on LinkedIn. “Although it is not someone I generally quote, Vladimir Putin said that the prevail will determine the management of the world in the future.”
“We cannot afford to wake up in the future where 50 different states have promulgated 50 contradictory AI security and security approaches,” said Fred Humphries, vice-president of American affairs in Microsoft, in a statement sent by email
The Chamber of Commerce of the Pro-Business Lobby has published a letter, signed by industrial groups such as the independent Petroleum Association of America and the Meat Institute, in Moratory support.
“More than 1,000 bills linked to AI have already been introduced to the level of the state and the local level this year. Without a federal moratorium, there will be a patchwork of state and local laws which will considerably limit the development and deployment of AI, “they wrote.
In opposition, a diversified set of 60 civil rights organizations, ranging from the American American Liberties Union to digital rights groups to NAACP, have signed their own open letter Discuss for states to adopt their own AI laws.
“The moratorium could inhibit the application of the state of civil rights laws which already prohibit algorithmic discrimination, affect consumer protection laws by limiting the capacity of consumers and prosecutors of the State to request the use of bad players and completely eliminate the laws on consumer confidentiality,” said the letter.
The national non -profit center on sexual exploitation opposed the moratorium on Tuesday, in particular by stressing how AI was used to sexually exploit minors.
AI technology is already used to generate sexual abuse equipment on children and to prepare and extort minors, said Haley McNamara, the main vice-president of the group’s initiatives and strategic programs.
“The AI moratorium in the budget bill is a Trojan horse which will end the efforts of the State to slow down sexual exploitation and other damages caused by artificial intelligence. This provision is extremely reckless and, if it is adopted, will lead to an additional AI armament for sexual exploitation,” said McNamara.
