Judicial deposits reveal the first works of Openai and IO on an IA device

Legal deposits submitted earlier this month with lawyers representing Openai and Jony IVE reveal new details on business efforts to build an electronic AI material device.

Deposits are part of a legal action of disputes tabled this month by Iyo, a hardware startup supported by Google developing personalized headphones that connect to other devices. During the weekend, Openai Promotional material drawn linked to his $ 6.5 billion in acquisition from the Jony IVE startup Io In order to comply with an order of the court involved in the trial. Openai says that it fights Iyo’s allegations in terms of brands violation.

In the past year, OpenAi leaders and former Apple leaders now working in IO have vigorously sought in-ear material devices, according to documents submitted in the Iyo trial. In a June 12Lawyers representing Openai and IO said that companies had bought at least 30 sets of helmets from various companies to explore what is on the market today. In recent months, the leaders of Openai and IO have also encountered the leadership of Iyo and have demonstrated their intra-ear technology, according to the emails revealed in the case.

That said, the first Openai device in collaboration with IO may not be a pair of headphones at all.

Tang Tan, a long -standing Apple leader who has co -founded IO and is the chief equipment director of the startup, says in a Court declaration That the PDG prototype of Openai, Sam Altman, mentioned in the launch video of IO “is not an intra-ear or a portable device”. Tan notes that the design of said prototype in not yet finalized and that the product is at least one year of advertising or sales for sale.

The form factor of the first material device of Openai and IO has largely remained a mystery. Altman simply said in IO’s launch video that the startup worked to create a “family” of AI aircraft with various capacities, and IVE said that IO’s first prototype “completely captured” his imagination.

Altman had previously declared to OpenAi employees at a meeting that the company’s prototype, once finished, could adapt in a pocket or sit on a desk, according to the Wall Street Journal. OPENAI’s CEO would have said that the device would be fully aware of the environment of a user and that it would be a “third device” that consumers can use alongside their smartphone and laptop.

“Our intention with this collaboration was, and is, to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces,” said Altman in a Court declaration Submitted on June 12.

The lawyers representing OpenAi also declared in a file that the company had explored a wide range of devices, including those which were “based on the desk and mobile, wireless and wired, portable and portable”.

While smart glasses have become the first row of AI compatible devices, with companies like Meta and Google Racing to develop the first largely adopted pair, several companies also explore AI compatible headphones. Apple would be Work on a pair of airpods with camerasWho would help fuel AI’s features by collecting information on the surrounding environment.

In recent months, the leaders of Openai and IO have carried out considerable research on intra-ear products.

On May 1, the vice-president of Openai de Product, Peter Wrelinder, and Tan met Iyo CEO, Jason Rugolo, to learn more about Iyo’s intra-ear product, according to an invitation by email revealed in the case. The meeting took place at the IO office in Jackson Square, the San Francisco district where IVE has bought several buildings Work on Lovefrom and Io.

During the meeting, Wrelinder and Tan tested Iyo’s personalized headset, but were disappointed when the product failed several times during the demonstrations, according to follow -up emails revealed in the case.

Tan claims in his declaration that he met Rugolo as a courtesy to his mentor, Apple’s long -standing director, Steve Zadesky, who recommended him to take the meeting. Tan also claims to have taken several precautions to avoid learning too much about Iyo’s IP, as suggesting that his lawyers examine the material before him.

However, it seemed that the employees of Openai and Io thought they could learn something from one of Iyo’s partners. To personalize his intra-ear headsets, Iyo sent a specialist in a ear sweeping company, the ear project, at the home or at someone’s office to get a detailed card of someone’s ear.

In one E-mail revealed in the caseMarwan Rammah, an former Apple engineer who is now working at IO, told Tan that the purchase of a large three -dimensional analysis database of the EAR project could give the company a “useful starting point on ergonomics”. We do not know if such an agreement took place.

Rugolo has tried several times to forge a deeper relationship between Iyo, Io and Openai – but has largely failed, according to emails. He launched Openai on the launch of the Iyo apparatus as an early “developer kit” for its final AI device. He presented Openai on investment in Iyo and, at some point, even offered to sell his whole business for $ 200 million, according to the file. However, Tan said in his declaration that he had refused these offers.

Evans Hankey, former Apple director, co-founder of IO and product director, said in a Court declaration This IO does not work on a “tailor -made earphones”.

The chatpt manufacturer seems to be more than a year by selling its first material device, which may not be an intrauricular product. Gven what the company said in this trial, it seems that it also explores other form factors.