Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Gemini Flash 2.0 of Google’s new gemini Flash 2.0 image generation tool is capable of Elimination of waterproofing from copyright -protected imagesUsers on social networks have found. The model is currently in its “experimental” phase, and available only for developers.
A multitude of applications capable of removing objects from the photos and filling the gaps are already available. The new generative AI models have made them even more capable, and companies like Adobe have added tools to move objects updated to their photo editors. Apple Intelligence includes a tool called “clean” on iOS and macOS which allows it for supported devices.
The post below on x shows how much Gemini Flash 2.0 is indeed by removing objects.
New unlocked skill: The Flash Gemini 2 model is really great to eliminate the watermark in pictures! pic.twitter.com/6qik0flfcv
– Deedy (@deedydas) March 15, 2025
The main closed models of Google and Openai are generally “Nerfed”, which means that they have significant restrictions in place to avoid legal problems. The latter’s image model of the latter will not generate images of characters protected by copyright, for example. Microsoft recently continued a group of individuals Who managed to deceive his image models in the generation of porn. Do not fear, / R / PhotoshoprequestAs Google will almost certainly try to reign in the moving of watermark.
As some have noted, it is probably impossible to put the cat back in the bag completely on it, because the open models have safety railing that can be deactivated. But by demonstrating that he makes efforts to prevent improper use, Google protects itself from legal responsibility. Even open models can be delivered with license agreements, and of course, the police and the courts can stop abuse.
A funny thing to note in the case of the removal of the watermark is that the Google model Add his own watermark to the images modified or generated by AI, in order to tell viewers clearly that it is not authentic. It could be described as an allegory of the AI itself: Take something that belongs to someone else, put any proof of property, then add your own identification brand.
