The Proton confidentiality manufacturer Proton continues Apple on alleged anti -competitive practices and fees allegedly allegedly

Software provider focused on Proton confidentiality, mail proton manufacturers, proton calendar, proton drive and other applications, Pursued Applealleging anti -competitive practices in the Apple App Store. In the new trial, Proton claims that the iPhone manufacturer has a monopoly on smartphone, applications distribution and application processing markets. He also compares Apple fees at Internet trade rates, calling them “artificial and arbitrary”.

The pursuit is looking for changes to the App Store and monetary damage, which, according to Proton, will be donated to organizations that are fighting for democracy and human rights.

The courtyard papersPlaced in the northern district of California, are part of a greater pursuit against Apple. Proton says he joins other developers, including a Korean developer groupwho also continue the technology giant.

The costume is among the last to challenge Apple’s starter on the mobile applications market.

He follows another battle of another year between the Epic and Apple Games, which Apple has largely won as he was declared not to be a monopolyDefine a precedent for the new trial to argue. However, the judge in this case has judged that Apple must leave us the application developers To their websites where they offer alternative payment mechanisms, without invoice a commission on these sales. (Apple still fights this case on appeal.)

Proton’s case takes a different angle. He quotes the epic case, saying that the evidence has proven that Apple achieves such a major profit on the store’s store costs that this is wondering if the costs are really necessary to support the maintenance of the App Store, as Apple claims.

Proton, similarly, disputes Apple’s policies around payments. He underlines how Apple prevented the developers from speaking directly to their customers in the application, where they could inform them of discounts on the web. In addition, applications that do not support the Apple payment system may be withdrawn from the App Store, says the prosecution.

The arguments concerning payments immerse themselves in other nuances on the functioning of the system, such as the way it is more difficult to manage payments and subscriptions between the devices due to Apple’s rules. For example, the company Explained in a blog article That customers who have upgraded their accounts on the web cannot demo their iOS device, which is a bad customer experience.

Proton also maintains that its calendar application cannot be defined by default, Although iOS allowed users to exchange Default values ​​for other applications such as browsers, emails, telephone calls, messaging, etc. And he notes that his protons reader is limited in the background treatment, unlike iCloud.

In particular, the case of Proton focuses on the way in which Apple’s unique distribution point with the App Store makes it a tool used by dictatorships around the world to silence freedom of expression. On this front, it indicates all the applications that Apple must delete to comply with the laws on markets such as Russia and China. This decision takes place to iOS developers, says Proton, as when its VPN application was threatened with moving because it claimed to “unlock censored websites”.

“Apple monopoly control over the distribution of iOS devices has a myriad of problems for consumers, businesses and society as a whole,” said the Proton post. “Anti-monopoly laws exist because the power offered by the status of monopoly inevitably leads to abuse. In the case of the giants of oligarchic technology, these abuses have vast implications for society, and it is vital for the future of the Internet that they are discussed now. ”

We contacted Apple to comment and we did not immediately hear.