The US federal judge refuses Trump’s offer to unlift the files of the Grand Jury of Epstein | Donald Trump News

In the United States, a federal judge rejected a request from the Ministry of Justice to release the transcriptions of a great investigation into the jury on the late sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Wednesday, the American district judge Robin Rosenberg of Florida said that his hands were “linked” in this area.

The disappointment of the Grand Jury’s testimony is relatively rare, given the need for secrecy in such sensitive criminal surveys.

There are only close exceptions to the federal criminal procedure which would allow the release of transcriptions, and judge Rosenberg indicated that they were not satisfied by the requests of the Ministry of Justice.

The request that judge Rosenberg received was one of the three issued by the Ministry of Justice, because it seeks to reject the indignation of the base of President Donald Trump on the absence of recent revelations in the Epstein scandal.

Epstein scandal conspiracy theories Theories

In February, the Attorney General Pam Bondi played the imminent release of a mine of documents related to Epstein, a disgrace and a condemned sex offender whose entourage included high -level figures.

Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while waiting for a trial in New York, fueling the theories of the conspiracy according to which his death could have been a concealment orchestrated by powerful dark characters.

But almost 200 pages Bondi and the Ministry of Justice finally published has not produced new major revelations. In particular, the “customer list” said that Bondi said that Fox News was “sitting on my desk at the moment to see again.”

Some of President Trump’s supporters have once again American (Maga) had pushed the idea that pedophiles had infiltrated the highest levels of popular government and media, and that Epstein has kept a list of customers in order to make these power brokers sing.

Even the name of Trump to direct the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Kash Patel, and his second commander Dan Bongino had promoted conspiracy theoriesAffirming that there was a “black book” or a “list” in possession of the government which would prove the rumors of Epstein.

But the FBI and the Ministry of Justice Cancel this speculation. In July, agencies published a joint memorandum deny the existence of such a list.

“This systematic review has not revealed any” list of incriminating customers “. No credible evidence also found that Epstein made eminent individuals sing in the context of his actions, “he read.

Meticulous examination on Trump

This, however, did not do much to reduce indignation, and control President Trump’s own relationship With Epstein.

The Wall Street Journal published this month an alleged report that Trump had signed a birthday note to Epstein with a suggestive message, alongside a doodle of a naked woman. Trump denied having written or drawn such a birthday message, and he a since prosecuted The Journal and its parent company.

But Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal continued its coverage of the Epstein scandal with an article which alleged that the Ministry of Justice knew that the name of Trump had appeared several times in files linked to the sex offender.

Steven Cheung, director of communications for the White House, described the latest report “Another false news”.

Trump called for the release of all Epstein transcriptions, calling the current scandal a “scam” and a “hoax”. He also repudiated one of his supporters who believed rumors.

“My ancient supporters joined this’ Bull **** ”” Hook, Line and Sinker “, Trump wrote on social networks on July 16. “Let these weakness continue to move forward and do the work of democrats.”

Although the Ministry of Justice argued that there is “in -depth public interest” to publish the transcriptions of the Grand Jury, the experts affirm that these testimonies contain little to contain the full extent of the evidence in the Epstein case.

The federal testimonies of the Grand Jury are generally short, providing only enough information to guarantee an indictment.

A former federal prosecutor, Sarah Krissoff, told the Associated Press that transcriptions should be a “distraction”.

“The president tries to present himself as if he was doing something here, and it’s really nothing,” Krissoff said in an interview published earlier this week.

Democrats are looking for an advantage

Democrats, on the other hand, sought to highlight the persistent issues about Epstein in order to harm Trump’s reputation with his supporters.

In the House of Representatives, for example, the Democrats of the Surveillance Committee launched an offer to assign the Ministry of Justice for all its Epstein files.

Rather than risking a vote to put pressure on other Epstein files, the Republican President of the House Mike Johnson postponed the chamber early for his August six weeks recreation.

Democrats like the representative Summer Lee seized this manouvre as proof of complicity.

“They flee our work, our work and send us home because they do not want to vote to publish these files,” said Lee.

But Johnson defended this decision this week, saying that Trump officials “were already doing everything in their power to release them.”