Trump promises “the peace agreement” in Ukraine after the Putin summit, reversing calls to a cease-fire

President Donald Trump promised a “peace agreement” to end the war in Ukraine following his Alaska summit with Russian president Vladimir Putinfalling down Ceasefire And arouse fears of getting closer to Putin’s position.

Trump made telephone calls overnight with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy – who goes to Washington for talks on Monday – and European leaders.

But the change of position aroused fears that Trump has adopted Putin’s position, while European leaders have reiterated that borders cannot change strength and analysts have warned potentially disastrous consequences.

“A great day very successful in Alaska!” Trump posted on Truth Social early Saturday after his return to the White House. “It was determined by all that the best way to put an end to the horrible war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not to a simple cease-fire agreement, which would often do not.”

Before the Alaska summit, Trump told Zelenskyy and European leaders during a call on Wednesday that he entered the meeting with Putin in order to obtain a cease-fire, according to two European officials and three other people informed of the call.

Trump and his counterparts agreed that a cease-fire should be implemented before peace negotiations could begin, they said, but this position seemed to change spectacular after his discussions with Putin.

Later on Saturday, Zelenskyy said, following a call with Trump, that “we have to make real and lasting peace, not just a break between Russian invasions”.

A joint declaration by European leaders – notably France, Italy, Germany, Great Britain, Finland and Poland, as well as the presidents of the European Commission and the European Council – did not recognize the inversion of Trump, but declared that new talks should include Zelenskyy, and that it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. “”

Although the substance of the Alaska summit is not clear, Trump’s remarks have raised new questions about the direction of the peace process.

“It seems that Putin’s arguments prevailed over those of European leaders, who insisted that a cease-fire had to be in place for negotiations to start,” Keir Giles, a main member of the London Chatham House, said Keir Giles in NBC News.

“The danger lies in the possibility that Trump is also convinced that Russia’s requests in Ukraine are valid,” he added, calling such a “disastrous, not only for Ukraine, but also for the security of Europe”.

These Russian requests remain swept.

They understand that Ukraine gives up the whole territory that Putin claims to have annexed and a permanent neutrality agreement, with the prohibition to join NATO. Moscow claims sovereignty in four Ukrainian regions – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson – in addition to Crimea, which he annexed in 2014.

Russian forces do not fully control the territory in these regions, and kyiv has repeatedly promised never to recognize their annexation.

Ukrainian leaders have insisted that any peace agreement must include “security guarantees” of Western allies to ensure that Russia cannot launch another offensive in the future. European leaders said on Saturday that Russia “cannot have a veto against the way from Ukraine to the EU and NATO (membership)”.

But Peter Watkins, associate member of Chatham House, says that Russia has given “no indication” to soften its requests, casting a doubt about the hopes of peace.

“The Russian strategic calculation is that they are better continuing to grind themselves rather than accepting a cease-fire,” he said. “If Russian requests have not changed, it is difficult to see how there will be a peace agreement.”

But not all observers consider the change of Trump as completely negative.

Balazs Jarabik, a non -resident scholar at the Endowment for International Peace Carnegie, argued that he could ultimately be beneficial for Ukraine and Europe.

“Kyiv loses the war of attrition, while Europe faces a big gap between its strategic posture and its real ability to support war”, he Written on x. “A framework for regulating the conflict could provide all parties, including Russia, with space to stabilize the situation.”

Meanwhile, fighting in the field have not slowed down.

Russian drone strikes hit several Ukraine regions overnight, Ukrainian officials said, even though the Trump-Putin summit was taking place in Alaska. “Confirmed strikes include missile and UAV blows: 24 drones have struck 12 locations,” the Ukraine air forces said in a statement.

And in the absence of a breakthrough, criticism say that the optics of the Alaska summit may have played the advantage of Putin while his nation continues its offensive.

“Putin received her treatment from the red carpet with Trump, while Trump got nothing,” said Wolfgang Ischinger, head of the Munich security conference, Written on x. “For Ukrainians: nothing. For Europe: deeply disappointing,” he added. “A clear 1 to 0 for Putin.”

The Russian delegation in Alaska has also remained satisfied with the summit.

Kirill Dmitriev, a Putin advisor who heads the Russian sovereign heritage fund, published A clip on x Friday showing a meeting with an Alaska bear who, he hoped, would provide good omens in Reunion.

“Bear was indeed a good sign,” he said on Saturday.