Tulsi Gabbard has sidelined in discussions on the administration of Trump on Israel and Iran

Washington – National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, a frank critic of US military interventions abroad, seems to have fallen into disgrace with President Donald Trump while he is weighing military action against Iran, according to several senior administration officials with knowledge of the case.

Gabbard’s allies insist that there is a tension of the White House, part of the public return is overestimated, and no interviewed by NBC News expects it to leave the administration because of the president’s policy of the president, even if this includes a direct involvement of the United States.

Gabbard’s politically perilous position broke out in the open air this week when Trump pushed him back on his testimony to the Congress in March. At that time, she said that the US intelligence community did not think that Iran was building a nuclear weapon – a commentary on a contradiction with Trump’s recent public declaration on the threat posed by Iran’s potential nuclear program.

“I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close to having one,” Trump Tell to journalists Tuesday on Air Force One.

A person who knows the case said that the point of view of the American intelligence community had not changed since Gabbard’s testimony in March.

But the idea that a president would openly refute his national intelligence director immediately stimulated questions on the question of whether it is now ICED of decision -making on the issue.

He too reflects a rift This is played out publicly in the Maga coalition of Trump, some supporters recommending the position of Israel in military action that this takes against Iran and others who say that the intervention would go against the philosophy of “America first”. Trump’s criticism with regard to the participation of the United States in past conflicts – and his campaign promise to be a “peacemakerIn his second mandate – brought unusual bed companions, like Gabbard, who had been a Democrat deputy.

Several senior administration officials said Gabbard had been sidelined in discussions on internal administration on the conflict between Israel and Iran. Even two of his allies who spoke to NBC News acknowledged that his position had taken a hit When she posted a video June 10 after a trip to Hiroshima, Japan. The video, which presented the simulated destruction of American cities and Gabbard’s warning concerning the dangers of nuclear war, annoyed the White House team, the officials said.

Gabbard did not attend a meeting of senior officials on June 8 at Camp David, the presidential retirement of Maryland, to discuss tensions between Israel and Iran, which raised new questions about its status in the administration. A White House official told NBC News that Gabbard was not present only because she had to participate in the planned training as a member of the National Guard.

Gabbard’s past positions on Iran, associated with his recent comments and Trump responses, forced senior administration officials in a difficult position. Gabbard has apparently been in contradiction with the administration line, but not to the point where they feel the need to abandon it.

“Tulsi is a veteran, a patriot, a faithful supporter of Pres Trump and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024,” said Vice-President JD Vance on Tuesday. “She is an essential member of our Nat dry team, and we are grateful for their tireless work to keep America away from foreign threats.”

Other Republicans, however, took shots on his recent comments from Iran.

“She obviously needs to change her drugs,” said senator John Kennedy, R-La., told Jewish Insider Last week.

Gabbard has long used his public platform to oppose an American military action against Iran and worked behind the scenes to try to find a diplomatic solution, two of the administration officials said.

In one case, Gabbard sought to request the help of European allies who have communication channels with Tehran, said an official.

This stands, sometimes, in direct conflict with Trump’s public comments on the now open combat between Israel and Iran, a fight he has recognized himself could now require American intervention.

“I can do it. I may not be. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do,” Trump told journalists on Wednesday.

The Gabbard allies who spoke at NBC News acknowledge that the video was not well received by White House officials, but said that fruits reported between her and Trump on the issue were overestimated.

“I heard that too,” said an ally Gabbard about the tension stimulated by Hiroshima’s video. “But I don’t think it reaches the level of the president himself. I am told that the case was” resolved “.”

Gabbard’s ally has minimized any idea that it would resign on Trump’s public reprimand or if the United States has directly involved in the Iran-Israeli conflict.

“The online assertion that she will resign if the president decides to take direct measures in Iran is false,” said the person.

The video, however, was circulating largely among the aid of the White House, and it suggested a lot why it took a public position that tensions degenerate and Trump seems ready to get more involved.

“I think it is generally in the position OK,” said a republican agent familiar with administrative thought. “In situations like this, people with republican and neocon more traditional opinions will take advantage of the opportunity to minimize its influence.”

Asked about the recent video on Hiroshima, the deputy chief of staff of Gabbard, Alexa Henning, said: “Recognizing the past is essential to inform the future. President Trump has declared several times in the past that he recognizes immeasurable suffering, and annihilation can be caused by nuclear war, which is why he was not the equivale

As a member of the Democrating Congress, candidate for the presidential election and supporter of Trump’s campaign in 2024, Gabbard presented himself as a fierce opponent of what she considers erroneous military interventions from America abroad, including wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the United States for the rebels in Libya and Syria.

During the electoral campaign last year, Gabbard accused the Biden administration of having brought the United States together “closer to the nuclear war than ever before”.

During Trump’s first mandate, Gabbard firmly criticized his management of Iran and his decision to withdraw the United States from a 2015 nuclear agreement which imposed limits on Tehran’s nuclear work in exchange for a relaxation of sanctions.

If Trump decides to order military strikes on Iran in the midst of Israel’s conversation that military pressure could cause the Tehran regime collapse, Gabbard would find himself in a delicate political position. She promised to make sure that America no longer engages in wars of “regime change”.

Gabbard was warmly welcomed in Mag’s political base in Trump during the last presidential election was considered at the time as an injection of ideological diversity.

A Trump administration official acknowledged that heterodox opinions that made her welcome to the Maga Movement The brand now as a foreigner in an administration that is seeking to merge around an antithetic policy at these points of view.

“If you adopt a chihuahua, you shouldn’t be surprised that you have a chihuahua,” said the person.